The Registry Of Ex-Military Land-Rovers Au, NZ, etc


This history is by no means complete, if you have any information about any of the Project Perentie vehicles, or any photographs of them please send or e-mail them to REMLR.

 

 

Project Perentie stemmed from the Australian Army requirement for a replacement for the Series 3 fleet, and the remaining Series 2 and 2a specialist vehicles. The Armies requirements were first released at a briefing to industry in July 1982, and tenders were released to manafacturers for supply of three vehicles in each category for evaluation by the Army. Those categories being 1 ton and 2 ton payloads.

Of the seven 1 ton submissions, the army chose three for further evaluation and comparitive trials. These were:

Of the seven 2 ton submissions the Land Rover 110 6x6 and Mercedes-Benz Unimog U1300 were selected for evaluation.

The evaluation vehicles were then handed over to the Army for extensive testing. One of each vehicle type was subjected to accelerated durability trials at the Army's Trials and Proving Wing at Monegeeta near Melbourne. Whilst the other two vehicles were involved in a very comprihensive series of user studies. This included hot wet trials at Tully in North Queensland, and cold weather trials at Khancoban in the Snowy Mountains. Various Army units around australia were also given an opportunity to trial the different vehicles.

Tenders for production numbers of the vehicles closed in October 1983. This tender called for 2500 1 ton and 400 2 ton vehicles to be produced over a three to four year period commencing in May 1986 with initial vehicles. The volume of the vehicles were to be delivered beginning in May 1987. Six basic types of the 1 ton and three types of the 2 ton were specified.

1 Tonne
Cargo/Personnel (Soft Top)
Cargo/Personnel Fitted For Radio (Soft Top)
Survey Vehicle (Hard Top)
Command Post (Hard Top)
Formation Commanders Vehicle (Station Wagon)
Personnel Carrier (Station Wagon)

2 Tonne

Cargo Truck
Artillery Vehicle
Ambulance

Although these vehicles were based on civilian specifications, the Army vehicles differed in regard to the povision of Army fittings and equipment, the level of Australian content, and the severity of vehicle operaions.

An interesting side note is the fact that 2 years after the 3 competing vehicles were entered into service, and before they were authorised for disposal, 2 registrations after the nine 4x4 vehicles were allocated to 2 Base Workshop for trials of two LWB Toyota Landcruisers. From here, history tells the story. The Land rover was the eventual winner for both contracts, and they have been going strong ever since, including a full rebuild to extend their service life in around 2006. So now a closer look at the competitors.

 
Designation
Year
ARN
Manafacturer
Engine No
Chassis No
Other Information
Auth For Disposal
LU1 ? 1983 37-824 Land Rover 4x4 909768 SALLDRAZ1A7400002 Parade Photos -
LU2 ? 1983 37-825 Land Rover 4x4 909769 SALLDRAZ1A7400003 Parade Photos -
LU3 1983 37-826 Land Rover 4x4 910052 SALLDRAZ1A7400004 On Dispaly at the Army Museum Bandiana.
Pucka and Monteega Trials
-
 
LT5T ? 1983 37-836 Land Rover 6x6 909767 SALLDMAZIA600002 Located at Army Museum Bandiana. Narrow Cab -
LT6 ? 1983 37-837 Land Rover 6x6 909770 SALLDMAZIA600003 Narrow Cab -
- 1983 37-838 Land Rover 6x6 909772 SALLDMAZIA600004 Narrow Cab -
N/A 1983 N/A Land Rover 6x6   SALLDMAZIA600005 LRA Reference Vehicle.
Became Wide Body prototype, then Dual cab prototype.
Still owned by LR, NSW rego ZCF-358. Archive Photo.
N/A
 
JU2 1983 37-827 Jeep 224197 000197 Pucka and Monteega Trials 07.10.1986
JU3 ? 1983 37-828 Jeep 224191 000199 - 07.10.1986
JU1 ? 1983 37-829 Jeep 224206 000206 - 07.10.1986
 
MU1 1983 37-830 MB 300 GD 000038 031612 - 26.11.1986
MU3 1983 37-831 MB 300 GD 000039 031613 Trials vehicle
Hot/Wet trials.
24.10.1986
MU2 1983 37-832 MB 300 GD 000040 031611 Trials vehicle.
Pucka and Monteega Trials
24.10.1986
 
- 1983 37-839 MB Unimog 758915 103061 - 24.10.1986
- 1983 37-840 MB Unimog 758911 103106 Trials vehicle.
Pucka and Monteega Trials
26.11.1986
- 1983 37-841 MB Unimog 758918 103107 Trials vehicle
Hot/Wet trials.
24.08.1987
         6.6.1985: Toyota Trial 2 years later?
- 1985 37-833 Toyota Landcruiser - - - -
- 1985 37-834 Toyota Landcruiser - - - -

 


The Land Rover 110 4x4 (Commonly refered to as the Perentie)

REMLR obviously contains a great deal of information about the eventual winner of Project Perentie, the Land Rover 110. You can access that information in the Perentie Index.

The images below are of one of the Project vehicles, 37-826, which survives today in the Army Museum Bandiana.

The chassis numbers of the 4x4 vehicles are nominally 400002, 400003 & 400004. However 3 were built for the army and one for Land Rover Australia, but one was written off in a crash on the way to be delivered and was replaced with the LRA vehicle. The 6x6 vehicles chassis numbers were 600002, 600003 and 600004. 600005 which must have been the LRA reference vehicle still exists and is owned by LRA. It is registered as a company vehicle. However, the vehicle is now a wide cab crew cab, having been converted from the original narrow cab reference vehicle into the prototype wide cab and subsequently into the prototype crew cab.

 

The below photos are courtesy of Land Rover Australia

The Trials vehicles in review. Two of the 4x4 Land Rovers.

Two of the 6x6 Land Rovers

Four of the five vehicles taking part in the trials, the jeep is notably absent, possibly broken down?

A file photo of one of the 4x4 trials Land Rovers.


The Mercedies-Benz 300GD

If you have any information or images about the Mercedies Benz vehicle that tool part in the trials, please let REMLR know.

 


THe 300GD on Trials. Photo courtesy of Land Rover Australia.

 


The Jeep AM10

Information about the AM10 Jeep are reasonably scarce and it is thought that at least one of the vehicles brought to Australia survives today in Australia. This vehicle appears to be a development on the civilian J10 Jeep ute. It is thought one of the reasons that the Jeep failed in it's attempt to secure the contract was it's automatic gearbox which was considered inadequate, and apparently axle breakages were also common on the trials. However the Jeep was automatically excluded because of it's petrol engine, and the requirements were for a diesel.

A very similar variant of the same vehicle was accepted and uses in US Airforce service.

The photographs below are from Jeep Action Magazine and further information from them about this vehicle will be arriving soon.

 

 

Go to www.remlr.com   Go Back